Capitalism only values nature by how it can be exploited.
Case in point.
People in my replies be like “bUt wHaT aBoUt fRuIt TrEes and CaMpInG GrOuNdS”. Yes that’s pretty much my point. Trees are only valuable if you can make money off them or hijack them for human activities, rather than because they literally sustain life on earth.
In capitalism’s eyes, everything is but a tool or resource to make profit. Workers and nature alike. A forest is not inherently “valuable” to a capitalist; individual people are treated as “human resources” and labour for 8 - 13 hours per day, most days of their life, until they’re physically too old to continue.
We will only attain a better world when nature and people become inherently valuable, rather than something to exploit.
failednearer24 liked this
thefirstneonphoenix liked this
abletreated27 liked this
hastoday43 liked this
easilypoet35 liked this
mostherself36 liked this
cottonplain29 liked this
diagramdiameter44 liked this
awkward-armidillo reblogged this from spacezaddie
insteadexactly43 liked this
tomorrowimportance22 liked this
lovelyhappily35 liked this
headingtrail28 liked this
previousapple32 liked this
icedrive44 liked this
panellistsipticus liked this
afternooncannot24 liked this
roughchance42 liked this
silentanywhere36 liked this
hurtuntil29 liked this
signcertainly39 liked this
floatingmust28 liked this
globeequally27 liked this
springbread26 liked this
handsomesolid22 liked this
thesepencil43 liked this
everywool45 liked this
fineexpression23 liked this
entirenoted35 liked this
behaviordeclared42 liked this
yikesman03 reblogged this from msmental
magnethome35 liked this
helpfuldrink45 liked this
boundmental35 liked this
lungsjob42 liked this
usingarrive24 liked this
seldomcorn41 liked this
steamland43 liked this
oncedirection35 liked this
fatherfood26 liked this
kryptoad liked this
slowmember35 liked this
haveyouth35 liked this